Compare models. Find the differences.
Add, remove, or change models in the table.
Benchmark snapshot
4 benchmarks in common.
4 models selected. 4 benchmarks in common.
Reported scores; test settings may differ.
| Benchmark | Anthropic | OpenAI | OpenAI | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena ELOHuman preference | 1,504 | 1,476 | 1,481 | 1,492 |
| LiveBench 1.0General reasoning | 83.4% | 82.2% | 81.6% | 80.1% |
| GPQA DiamondScientific knowledge | 93.7% | 96.0% | Not in our dataset | 93.7% |
| HLEAcademic reasoning | 46.5% | 54.8% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning | 86.6% | 83.6% | 82.9% | 80.6% |
| GSOGraduate science | 88.2% | 79.4% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning | 90.0% | 93.3% | 91.7% | 88.3% |
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
| Specification | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-6 Astra Thinking | GPT-6.1 Sol Thinking | Claude Opus 5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | $10 | $10 | $2 | $5 |
| Output | $50 | $50 | $10 | $25 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.0M |
| Pricing details | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → |
How to read this comparison
Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.
These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.
Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.