Compare models. Find the differences.

Add, remove, or change models in the table.

Benchmark snapshot

0 benchmarks in common.

4 models selected. 0 benchmarks in common.

Reported scores; test settings may differ.

Reported benchmark results for Claude Opus 4 4.6 Non-thinking, Qwen3 Max, Gemma 4 31B IT Thinking, Grok 4.7
Benchmark
Anthropic
Qwen
Google
xAI
Arena ELOHuman preference1,496Not in our dataset1,4521,441
LiveBench 1.0General reasoningNot in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset77.4%
GPQA DiamondScientific knowledgeNot in our datasetNot in our dataset84.3%Not in our dataset
HLEAcademic reasoning19.0%30.2%19.5%Not in our dataset
MMLU ProMulti-task understandingNot in our dataset85.7%85.2%Not in our dataset
SWE-Bench VerifiedAgentic codingNot in our dataset75.3%Not in our datasetNot in our dataset
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive codingNot in our datasetNot in our dataset80.0%Not in our dataset
ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoningNot in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset61.4%
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
SpecificationClaude Opus 4 4.6 Non-thinkingQwen3 MaxGemma 4 31B IT ThinkingGrok 4.7
Input$5$0.78$0.2$3
Output$25$3.9$0.4$15
Context window200K262K262K256K
Pricing detailsExplore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →
How to read this comparison

Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.

These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.

Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.