Compare models. Find the differences.

Add, remove, or change models in the table.

Benchmark snapshot

2 benchmarks in common.

4 models selected. 2 benchmarks in common.

Reported scores; test settings may differ.

Reported benchmark results for Claude Opus 4 4.8 Thinking, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Qwen3 Max Qwen 3.8 Max, GPT-5.6 Sol Thinking
Benchmark
Anthropic
Google
Qwen
OpenAI
Arena ELOHuman preference1,4821,4901,4821,485
LiveBench 1.0General reasoning76.2%78.8%78.5%81.0%
GPQA DiamondScientific knowledge93.6%Not in our datasetNot in our dataset94.6%
HLEAcademic reasoning49.8%Not in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset
SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning64.8%Not in our datasetNot in our dataset64.8%
GSOGraduate science47.1%Not in our datasetNot in our dataset76.5%
SWE-Bench VerifiedAgentic coding88.6%Not in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset
ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning72.1%84.6%Not in our dataset90.0%
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
SpecificationClaude Opus 4 4.8 ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max Qwen 3.8 MaxGPT-5.6 Sol Thinking
Input$5$0.75$0.78$4
Output$25$3.75$3.9$20
Context window200K1.0M262K1.1M
Pricing detailsExplore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →
How to read this comparison

Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.

These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.

Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.