Compare models. Find the differences.
Add, remove, or change models in the table.
Benchmark snapshot
2 benchmarks in common.
4 models selected. 2 benchmarks in common.
Reported scores; test settings may differ.
| Benchmark | Anthropic | Google | OpenAI | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena ELOHuman preference | 1,509 | 1,520 | 1,476 | 1,504 |
| LiveBench 1.0General reasoning | 83.2% | Not in our dataset | 82.2% | 83.4% |
| GPQA DiamondScientific knowledge | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 96.0% | 93.7% |
| HLEAcademic reasoning | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 54.8% | 46.5% |
| SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning | 88.4% | Not in our dataset | 83.6% | 86.6% |
| GSOGraduate science | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 79.4% | 88.2% |
| ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning | 92.5% | 91.3% | 93.3% | 90.0% |
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
| Specification | Claude Opus 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6 Astra Thinking | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | $4 | $2 | $10 | $10 |
| Output | $20 | $10 | $50 | $50 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M | 1.1M | 1.0M |
| Pricing details | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → |
How to read this comparison
Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.
These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.
Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.