Compare models. Find the differences.

Add, remove, or change models in the table.

Benchmark snapshot

2 benchmarks in common.

4 models selected. 2 benchmarks in common.

Reported scores; test settings may differ.

Reported benchmark results for Claude Sonnet 5.5, Qwen3 Max Qwen 3.8 Max, Claude Opus 4 4.7 Thinking, Gemini 3 Pro 3.1
Benchmark
Anthropic
Qwen
Anthropic
Google
Arena ELOHuman preference1,4771,4821,5011,487
LiveBench 1.0General reasoning77.8%78.5%76.5%77.0%
GPQA DiamondScientific knowledgeNot in our datasetNot in our dataset94.2%94.3%
HLEAcademic reasoning46.1%Not in our dataset46.9%44.4%
SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning75.9%Not in our dataset61.7%79.6%
GSOGraduate scienceNot in our datasetNot in our dataset44.1%22.6%
SWE-Bench VerifiedAgentic codingNot in our datasetNot in our dataset87.6%80.6%
Tau-BenchAgentic tool useNot in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset90.8%
Terminal-BenchAgentic terminalNot in our datasetNot in our dataset69.4%68.5%
ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning83.9%Not in our dataset68.3%77.1%
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
SpecificationClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3 Max Qwen 3.8 MaxClaude Opus 4 4.7 ThinkingGemini 3 Pro 3.1
Input$2$0.78$5$2
Output$10$3.9$25$12
Context window1.0M262K1.0M1.0M
Pricing detailsExplore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →
How to read this comparison

Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.

These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.

Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.