Compare models. Find the differences.

Add, remove, or change models in the table.

Benchmark snapshot

2 benchmarks in common.

4 models selected. 2 benchmarks in common.

Reported scores; test settings may differ.

Reported benchmark results for Gemini 3.5 Flash, Kimi K3 Thinking, GPT-5.4 Thinking, GLM-5.3 Thinking
Benchmark
Google
Moonshot
OpenAI
Zhipu AI
Arena ELOHuman preference1,4781,4881,4751,481
LiveBench 1.0General reasoning74.6%79.2%78.0%76.1%
GPQA DiamondScientific knowledgeNot in our datasetNot in our dataset92.8%Not in our dataset
HLEAcademic reasoning40.2%Not in our dataset43.9%Not in our dataset
SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning76.7%60.7%Not in our dataset66.2%
GSOGraduate scienceNot in our datasetNot in our dataset31.4%Not in our dataset
Terminal-BenchAgentic terminalNot in our datasetNot in our dataset75.1%Not in our dataset
ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning72.1%60.4%74.0%Not in our dataset
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
SpecificationGemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3 ThinkingGPT-5.4 ThinkingGLM-5.3 Thinking
Input$1.5$0.192$2.5$0.07
Output$9$16$15$1.4
Context window1.0M1.0M1.1M1.0M
Pricing detailsExplore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →
How to read this comparison

Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.

These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.

Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.