Compare models. Find the differences.

Add, remove, or change models in the table.

Benchmark snapshot

2 benchmarks in common.

4 models selected. 2 benchmarks in common.

Reported scores; test settings may differ.

Reported benchmark results for Muse Spark 1.1, GPT-5.6 Sol Thinking, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Gemini 3.7 Flash
Benchmark
Meta
OpenAI
Google
Google
Arena ELOHuman preference1,4901,4851,4961,490
LiveBench 1.0General reasoning75.3%81.0%75.8%78.8%
GPQA DiamondScientific knowledgeNot in our dataset94.6%95.3%Not in our dataset
HLEAcademic reasoningNot in our datasetNot in our dataset44.5%Not in our dataset
SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoningNot in our dataset64.8%82.4%Not in our dataset
GSOGraduate scienceNot in our dataset76.5%Not in our datasetNot in our dataset
ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoningNot in our dataset90.0%89.2%84.6%
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
SpecificationMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.6 Sol ThinkingGemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash
InputNot available$4$0.825$0.75
OutputNot available$20$4.125$3.75
Context windowNot available1.1M1.0M1.0M
Pricing detailsExplore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →
How to read this comparison

Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.

These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.

Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.