Compare models. Find the differences.
Add, remove, or change models in the table.
Benchmark snapshot
2 benchmarks in common.
4 models selected. 2 benchmarks in common.
Reported scores; test settings may differ.
| Benchmark | MiniMax | OpenAI | OpenAI | xAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena ELOHuman preference | 1,385 | 1,402 | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| LiveBench 1.0General reasoning | Not in our dataset | 75.7% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| GPQA DiamondScientific knowledge | 83.0% | 78.0% | 80.1% | 79.0% |
| HLEAcademic reasoning | 22.2% | 8.1% | 14.9% | 11.0% |
| MMLU ProMulti-task understanding | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 80.8% | Not in our dataset |
| SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning | 34.7% | 40.1% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| AIME 2025Mathematics | 83.0% | 79.2% | Not in our dataset | 83.0% |
| AiderCode editing | Not in our dataset | 61.7% | 41.8% | Not in our dataset |
| SWE-Bench VerifiedAgentic coding | Not in our dataset | 48.9% | 62.0% | Not in our dataset |
| LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding | Not in our dataset | 63.9% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| Tau-BenchAgentic tool use | Not in our dataset | 70.8% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| Terminal-BenchAgentic terminal | 29.2% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 0.4% |
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
| Specification | M2 M2.1 | o1 | GPT-OSS 120B Thinking | Grok 3 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.3 | $15 | $0.03 | $0.3 |
| Output | $1.2 | $60 | $0.136 | $0.5 |
| Context window | 205K | 200K | 131K | 131K |
| Pricing details | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → |
How to read this comparison
Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.
These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.
Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.