Compare models. Find the differences.
Add, remove, or change models in the table.
Benchmark snapshot
1 benchmarks in common.
4 models selected. 1 benchmarks in common.
Reported scores; test settings may differ.
| Benchmark | OpenAI | Qwen | Google | Qwen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena ELOHuman preference | 1,445 | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 1,347 |
| LiveBench 1.0General reasoning | Not in our dataset | 59.6% | 67.8% | 59.8% |
| GPQA DiamondScientific knowledge | 71.4% | 54.8% | 68.2% | 54.6% |
| HLEAcademic reasoning | 5.4% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| MMLU ProMulti-task understanding | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 79.4% | Not in our dataset |
| SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning | 34.5% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
| AIME 2025Mathematics | Not in our dataset | 23.3% | 46.6% | 20.2% |
| AiderCode editing | 44.9% | Not in our dataset | 44.0% | Not in our dataset |
| LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding | Not in our dataset | 29.0% | Not in our dataset | 31.3% |
| Tau-BenchAgentic tool use | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 64.3% | Not in our dataset |
| ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning | 0.8% | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset |
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
| Specification | GPT-4.5 Non-thinking | 3 14B Non-thinking | Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking | 3 32B Non-thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | Not available | $0.12 | $0.3 | $0.08 |
| Output | Not available | $0.24 | $2.5 | $0.28 |
| Context window | Not available | 41K | 1.0M | 131K |
| Pricing details | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → |
How to read this comparison
Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.
These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.
Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.