Compare models. Find the differences.
Add, remove, or change models in the table.
Benchmark snapshot
3 benchmarks in common.
4 models selected. 3 benchmarks in common.
Reported scores; test settings may differ.
| Benchmark | OpenAI | Google | Anthropic | Google |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena ELOHuman preference | 1,485 | 1,490 | 1,482 | 1,496 |
| LiveBench 1.0General reasoning | 81.0% | 78.8% | 76.2% | 75.8% |
| GPQA DiamondScientific knowledge | 94.6% | Not in our dataset | 93.6% | 95.3% |
| HLEAcademic reasoning | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 49.8% | 44.5% |
| SimpleBenchCommonsense reasoning | 64.8% | Not in our dataset | 64.8% | 82.4% |
| GSOGraduate science | 76.5% | Not in our dataset | 47.1% | Not in our dataset |
| SWE-Bench VerifiedAgentic coding | Not in our dataset | Not in our dataset | 88.6% | Not in our dataset |
| ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning | 90.0% | 84.6% | 72.1% | 89.2% |
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
| Specification | GPT-5.6 Sol Thinking | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Claude Opus 4 4.8 Thinking | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | $4 | $0.75 | $5 | $0.825 |
| Output | $20 | $3.75 | $25 | $4.125 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1.0M | 200K | 1.0M |
| Pricing details | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → | Explore pricing → |
How to read this comparison
Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.
These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.
Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.