Compare models. Find the differences.

Add, remove, or change models in the table.

Benchmark snapshot

0 benchmarks in common.

4 models selected. 0 benchmarks in common.

Reported scores; test settings may differ.

Reported benchmark results for Grok 4.7, Claude Opus 4 4.6 Non-thinking, GLM-5.3 Flash Thinking, Qwen3 Max
Benchmark
xAI
Anthropic
Zhipu AI
Qwen
Arena ELOHuman preference1,4411,4961,477Not in our dataset
LiveBench 1.0General reasoning77.4%Not in our dataset71.6%Not in our dataset
HLEAcademic reasoningNot in our dataset19.0%Not in our dataset30.2%
MMLU ProMulti-task understandingNot in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset85.7%
SWE-Bench VerifiedAgentic codingNot in our datasetNot in our datasetNot in our dataset75.3%
ARC-AGI-2Visual reasoning61.4%Not in our dataset65.8%Not in our dataset
Pricing & context Published USD rates per 1M tokens
SpecificationGrok 4.7Claude Opus 4 4.6 Non-thinkingGLM-5.3 Flash ThinkingQwen3 Max
Input$3$5$0.027$0.78
Output$15$25$0.1$3.9
Context window256K200K1.0M262K
Pricing detailsExplore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →Explore pricing →
How to read this comparison

Each column keeps the exact model version you selected. Shared benchmarks are the intersection of their reported results; “all coverage” also shows where evidence is missing. Missing results never count as zero.

These are published benchmark scores, not a controlled head-to-head test. The available evidence does not establish matching evaluation settings, so we show no cross-model winner highlights or deltas. Composite quality scores are omitted because they can summarize different benchmark sets.

Scores and statistics are computed upstream. This page reads a fixed data snapshot; its date describes the snapshot, not the date of every measurement.